From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. Bank of America

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 7, 2011
No. CIV S-10-2445 FCD EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-2445 FCD EFB PS.

February 7, 2011


ORDER


On December 22, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.

Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified Sch. Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).

The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed December 22, 2010, are ADOPTED;

2. Plaintiff Moore's claims against defendant Turner are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2); and

3. Plaintiff Moore is permitted to withdraw as a plaintiff in this action.

DATED: February 7, 2011.


Summaries of

Moore v. Bank of America

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 7, 2011
No. CIV S-10-2445 FCD EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2011)
Case details for

Moore v. Bank of America

Case Details

Full title:TERESA J. MOORE, GERTRUDE V. VIZMANOS, Plaintiffs, v. BANK OF AMERICA, et…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 7, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-2445 FCD EFB PS (E.D. Cal. Feb. 7, 2011)