From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. Arce Fresno, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 24, 2012
CASE NO. CV F 12-0769 LJO GSA (E.D. Cal. Jul. 24, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. CV F 12-0769 LJO GSA

07-24-2012

RONALD MOORE, Plaintiff, v. ARCE FRESNO, LLC, et al., Defendants.


ORDER AFTER SETTLEMENT

(Doc. 31.)

Plaintiff's counsel notified this Court that settlement has been reached with defendant Save Mart Supermarkets only. Pursuant to this Court's Local Rule 160, this Court ORDERS plaintiff, no later than August 24, 2012, to file appropriate papers to dismiss or conclude this action as to defendant Save Mart Supermarkets, or to show good cause why the action as to defendant Save Mart Supermarkets has not been dismissed or concluded.

Failure to comply with this order may be grounds for the imposition of sanctions on counsel or parties who contributed to violation of this order. See Local Rules160 and 272. This Court ADMONISHES the parties and counsel that they are expected to obey the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and this Court's Local Rules and orders and are subject to sanctions as this Court deems appropriate.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Lawrence J. O'Neill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Moore v. Arce Fresno, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 24, 2012
CASE NO. CV F 12-0769 LJO GSA (E.D. Cal. Jul. 24, 2012)
Case details for

Moore v. Arce Fresno, LLC

Case Details

Full title:RONALD MOORE, Plaintiff, v. ARCE FRESNO, LLC, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 24, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. CV F 12-0769 LJO GSA (E.D. Cal. Jul. 24, 2012)