From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moore v. Allen

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Oct 15, 2010
2:10-cv-0034-PMP-RJJ (D. Nev. Oct. 15, 2010)

Opinion

2:10-cv-0034-PMP-RJJ.

October 15, 2010


ORDER


This matter was referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge on Defendants' Motion to Strike Order Requiring Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (#31).

The Court having reviewed the Motion (#31) and good cause appearing therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Strike Order Requiring Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (#31) is DENIED. The parties are authorized to pursue discovery on the remaining claims and will do so according to an approved discovery schedule.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties have to and including October 29, 2010, to comply with the Court's Order (#29).

DATED this 15th Day of October, 2010.


Summaries of

Moore v. Allen

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Oct 15, 2010
2:10-cv-0034-PMP-RJJ (D. Nev. Oct. 15, 2010)
Case details for

Moore v. Allen

Case Details

Full title:ROGER MOORE, Plaintiff, v. C/O ALLEN, et al., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Oct 15, 2010

Citations

2:10-cv-0034-PMP-RJJ (D. Nev. Oct. 15, 2010)