From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mooney v. Provident Sav. Bank

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Feb 11, 1999
318 N.J. Super. 257 (App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

Argued January 21, 1999.

Decided February 11, 1999.

Appeal from the Superior Court, Chancery Division, Monmouth County, McGann, J.S.C.,

Before Judges WALLACE and NEWMAN.

W. Peter Ragan, argued the cause for appellants (Ragan Ragan, attorneys; Mr. Ragan and Laura Rienzi Diver, on the brief)

Kathleen R. Wall, argued the cause for respondents.


Defendants, William and Esther Dioguardi, appeal from that portion of the order discharging their mortgage on the property known as 510 West End Avenue, Avon, New Jersey and denying their motion to dismiss plaintiffs' complaint.

We affirm substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge McGann's well-reasoned opinion, Mooney v. The Provident Savings Bank, 308 N.J. Super. 195, 705 A.2d 816 (Ch.Div. 1997). We agree that the equitable considerations found to exist by Judge McGann allowed him to depart from the warranty of title theory adhered to in Old Republic Insurance Co. v. Currie, 284 N.J. Super. 571, 665 A.2d 1153 (Ch.Div. 1995). As noted, defendants here were given notice of the Sheriff's sale, which they chose not to attend. There was no competitive bidding at the Sheriff's sale at which plaintiffs successfully bid on the property. Plaintiffs received a Sheriff's deed. Plaintiffs did not engage in any fraudulent conduct: in acquiring 510 West End Avenue, a residence which they previously owned, nor had they entered into, by the terms of the original mortgage given to defendants, any contractual undertaking to lay off any of the junior encumbrancers. We agree on these facts, there is no equitable basis for reviving defendants' lien on the property, which was extinguished in plaintiffs' bankruptcy discharge and the property was subsequently acquired by plaintiffs at the Sheriff's sale.

The order discharging the mortgage is affirmed.


Summaries of

Mooney v. Provident Sav. Bank

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
Feb 11, 1999
318 N.J. Super. 257 (App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Mooney v. Provident Sav. Bank

Case Details

Full title:EUGENE E. MOONEY AND SHARYN A. MOONEY, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. THE…

Court:Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division

Date published: Feb 11, 1999

Citations

318 N.J. Super. 257 (App. Div. 1999)
723 A.2d 634

Citing Cases

1960 Superfine Lane Owners Ass'n v. Haronis

See Holland v. Fulbert, Inc., 371 N.Y.S.2d 509, 512 (1975); Green v. United States, 434 F. Supp. 2d 1116,…