From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mooney v. Boeing Co.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
Jun 30, 2020
C.A. No. K20C-04-025 WLW (Del. Super. Ct. Jun. 30, 2020)

Opinion

C.A. No. K20C-04-025 WLW

06-30-2020

MATTHEW B. MOONEY, Plaintiff, v. THE BOEING COMPANY, Defendant.


ORDER DENYING REASSIGNMENT TO THE COMPLEX COMMERCIAL LITIGATION DIVISION

Upon consideration of Defendant The Boeing Company's Motion to Reassign this case to the Complex Commercial Litigation Division ("CCLD") and Plaintiff's Responses thereto, the Court finds:

Motion to Reassign to Complex Commercial Litigation ("Mot. Reassign CCLD") (Trans. ID. 65669429); Defendant's Reply (Trans. ID. 65679195).

Plaintiff's Response ("Pl. Resp.") (Trans. ID. 65673095); Plaintiff's Supplemental Response (Trans. ID. 65682265).

1. This Motion arises from Plaintiff Matthew Mooney's civil suit against The Boeing Company ("Boeing") alleging claims of fraudulent misrepresentation, fraudulent concealment, and fraud by omission.

Compl. ¶¶ 343, 357, 367 (Trans. ID. 65595241).

2. Mooney, as an investor of Boeing, alleges that Boeing misrepresented the qualities, characteristics, costs, value, and safety of its 737 MAX airplane to the Federal Aviation Association, its customers, and its investors.

See id. ¶¶ 24-25.

3. In its Motion, Boeing asks the Court to reassign this matter to the CCLD, asserting it qualifies for reassignment because the amount in controversy exceeds $1 million and the claims at issue do not fall under any of the excluded criteria.

Mot. Reassign CCLD at 1-2.

4. Mooney objects to reassignment, arguing that although the amount in controversy is substantial, the nature of the dispute - "a simple tort action predicated upon the defendant's alleged misrepresentations, concealment, and omissions" - is not sufficiently complex to warrant reassignment to the CCLD. In addition, Mooney argues that reassignment of the case, which would result in a change of venue from Kent County to New Castle County, would impose undue hardship and expense on him. Mooney, who is self-represented and resides in Glen Allen, Virginia, claims that he specifically chose the Superior Court in Kent County as the venue for this action because Kent County is closer to his residence.

Pl. Resp. at 1.

Id. at 1-2. On this point, the Court notes that reassignment to the CCLD does not automatically mean a change in venue to New Castle County.

Id.

5. The Court finds that although the case exceeds the amount in controversy requirement for the CCLD, the claims do not require the CCLD's resources and attention for adjudication on the merits.

See McLeod v. The Doctors Co., 2020 WL 1849716, at *1 (Del. Super. Ct. Apr. 13, 2020). --------

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant The Boeing Company's Motion is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/_________

Jan R. Jurden, President Judge Cc: Prothonotary


Summaries of

Mooney v. Boeing Co.

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
Jun 30, 2020
C.A. No. K20C-04-025 WLW (Del. Super. Ct. Jun. 30, 2020)
Case details for

Mooney v. Boeing Co.

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW B. MOONEY, Plaintiff, v. THE BOEING COMPANY, Defendant.

Court:SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

Date published: Jun 30, 2020

Citations

C.A. No. K20C-04-025 WLW (Del. Super. Ct. Jun. 30, 2020)