From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moon v. Rush

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 20, 2015
2:11-cv-3102 GEB CKD (E.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2015)

Opinion


VIRGINIA C. MOON, Plaintiff, v. DAVID H. RUSH, et al., Defendants. No. 2:11-cv-3102 GEB CKD United States District Court, E.D. California. March 20, 2015

          ORDER

          GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge.

         On March 19, 2015, the parties and counsel met in a settlement conference in the above captioned case. Appearances were placed on the record. The parties reached agreement on a total settlement, and those terms were placed on the record. The case is now settled. The court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement.

         The trial date and all other scheduled dates in this action are vacated. Dispositional documents, which shall at the least stipulate to a dismissal of this case in its entirety with prejudice, shall be filed within thirty days of March 19, 2015. The two related state cases now pending shall be dismissed in their entirety with prejudice as well, within the thirty day period.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Moon v. Rush

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 20, 2015
2:11-cv-3102 GEB CKD (E.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2015)
Case details for

Moon v. Rush

Case Details

Full title:VIRGINIA C. MOON, Plaintiff, v. DAVID H. RUSH, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 20, 2015

Citations

2:11-cv-3102 GEB CKD (E.D. Cal. Mar. 20, 2015)