Opinion
Case No. 2:11-cv-03102-GEB-CKD
01-04-2012
VIRGINIA C. MOON, on her own behalf and on behalf of the Peters Rush Habib & McKenna 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan, Plaintiff, v. DAVID H. RUSH, MARK A. HABIB, and JAMES P. MCKENNA, Defendants.
LEWIS, FEINBERG, LEE, RENAKER & JACKSON, P.C. Nina Wasow Attorneys for Plaintiff VIRGINIA C. MOON, on her own behalf and on behalf of the Peters Rush Habib & McKenna 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan, TRUCKER ? HUSS R. Bradford Huss Attorneys for Defendants David H. Rush, Mark A. Habib, and James P. McKenna
R. Bradford Huss (SBN 71303)
Maria K. Letellier (SBN 234969)
TRUCKER ? HUSS
Attorneys for Defendants
David H. Rush, Mark A. Habib, and James P. McKenna
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
Plaintiff in the above-entitled action, Virginia C. Moon, on her own behalf and on behalf of the Peters Rush Habib & McKenna 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan, by and through her undersigned counsel, hereby stipulates that Defendants David H. Rush, Mark A. Habib, and James P. McKenna (collective the "Defendants") shall have up to and including January 20, 2012, to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint in this action.
This is the first stipulation in this case between Plaintiff and the Defendants to extend time to answer or otherwise respond to any complaint filed in this action, and it does not affect any deadline set by the Court.
LEWIS, FEINBERG, LEE, RENAKER &
JACKSON, P.C.
By: ____________
Nina Wasow
Attorneys for Plaintiff
VIRGINIA C. MOON, on her own behalf and
on behalf of the Peters Rush Habib &
McKenna 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan,
TRUCKER ? HUSS
By: _______________
R. Bradford Huss
Attorneys for Defendants
David H. Rush, Mark A. Habib, and James P.
McKenna
I attest that my firm has obtained Ms. Wasow's concurrence in the filing of this document.
TRUCKER ? HUSS
By: _________
R. Bradford Huss
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
____________
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
United States District Judge