From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moon v. Rush

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 6, 2012
2:11-cv-03102-GEB-CKD (E.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2012)

Opinion

2:11-cv-03102-GEB-CKD

07-06-2012

VIRGINIA C. MOON, on her own behalf and on behalf of the Peters Rush Habib & McKenna 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan, Plaintiff, v. DAVID H. RUSH, MARK A. HABIB and JAMES P. MCKENNA, Defendants.


ORDER

Page 2 of Exhibit 1 attached to Nina Wasow's Declaration (ECF No. 34) contains identifying information prohibited by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure ("Rule") 5.2(a) and Local Rule 140(a). Therefore, Plaintiff shall re-file the Wasow Declaration with a redacted copy of Exhibit 1, which conforms to Rule 5.2(a) and Local Rule 140(a), no later than July 9, 2012.

Further, the Clerk of the Court shall file the original Wasow Declaration, with exhibits, under seal. (ECF No. 34.)

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________________

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Moon v. Rush

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 6, 2012
2:11-cv-03102-GEB-CKD (E.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Moon v. Rush

Case Details

Full title:VIRGINIA C. MOON, on her own behalf and on behalf of the Peters Rush Habib…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 6, 2012

Citations

2:11-cv-03102-GEB-CKD (E.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2012)