From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MOOK v. DAVIS CO

City Court of New York — General Term
Mar 1, 1894
7 Misc. 740 (N.Y. City Ct. 1894)

Opinion

March, 1894.

Burr DeLacy, for respondent.

Chambers Boughton, for appellant.


This action is brought to recover damages for a wrongful discharge.

It is claimed by the appellant that the only error committed on the trial was in the rejection by the trial justice of certain evidence offered by the defendant on the trial.

A careful reading of the printed case fails to disclose any error on the part of the trial justice that would warrant us in disturbing the judgment herein.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

McCARTHY, J., concurs.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

MOOK v. DAVIS CO

City Court of New York — General Term
Mar 1, 1894
7 Misc. 740 (N.Y. City Ct. 1894)
Case details for

MOOK v. DAVIS CO

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM H. MOOK, Respondent, v . PARKE, DAVIS Co., Appellant

Court:City Court of New York — General Term

Date published: Mar 1, 1894

Citations

7 Misc. 740 (N.Y. City Ct. 1894)