Moody v. Thompson

1 Citing case

  1. Jackson, Hunter Gould Coal Co. v. Holton

    118 P.2d 1018 (Okla. 1941)

    The trial court's instructions would have permitted recovery on either the issue of ownership or of principal and factor. If the intervener was the owner, its recovery should be the value of the coal; if a factor, it held a lien to the amount of its cash advances at least. Moody v. Thompson, 65 Okla. 262, 166 P. 96. But the intervener insists that the instructions were incomplete and not sufficiently informative to permit a clear understanding thereof on the part of the jury.