From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moody v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi
Apr 21, 1988
749 S.W.2d 932 (Tex. App. 1988)

Opinion

No. 13-88-100-CR.

April 21, 1988.

Appeal from the 107th District Court of Cameron County; Gilberto Hinojosa, J.

Abel Toscano, Jr., Harlingen, for appellant.

Ben Euresti, Jr., County Crim. Dist. Atty., Brownsville, for appellee.

OPINION


Pursuant to Tex.R.App.P. 41(b)(1) and 54(b), the notice of appeal and transcript were due to be filed on January 13, 1988, and February 12, 1988, respectively. The transcript was not received in this Court until March 15, 1988. Upon inspection of the transcript, it appeared that the notice of appeal and transcript had not been timely filed. No statement of facts has been filed.

On March 21, 1988, pursuant to Tex.R.App.P. 56(a), appellant's attorney was given notice of these defects so that steps could be taken to correct the defects, if it could be done. Appellant's attorney was advised that if after the expiration of ten days the transcript was not amended to show the jurisdiction of this Court, or motions pursuant to Tex.R.App.P. 41(b)(2) and 54(c) were not filed, the appeal would be dismissed. To date, appellant has not responded.

The Court, having considered the late notice of appeal, late transcript and appellant's failure to respond, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.


Summaries of

Moody v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi
Apr 21, 1988
749 S.W.2d 932 (Tex. App. 1988)
Case details for

Moody v. State

Case Details

Full title:Eleazar MOODY, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi

Date published: Apr 21, 1988

Citations

749 S.W.2d 932 (Tex. App. 1988)

Citing Cases

Miles v. State

Although two other courts of appeals have assumed jurisdiction in the absence of a timely-filed notice of…