From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moody v. Monroe

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Nov 20, 2003
No. 02-03-114-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 20, 2003)

Opinion

No. 02-03-114-CV.

DELIVERED: November 20, 2003.

Appeal from County Court at Law No. 2 of Denton County.

Attorney(s) for Appellant: Amis Bell and John L. Farish of Dallas, TX.

Attorney(s) for Appellee: Michael E. Schmidt of Dallas, TX.

PANEL D: SAM J. DAY, J. (Retired, Sitting by Assignment); LIVINGSTON and DAUPHINOT, JJ.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT


On July 24, 2003, we notified appellant by letter that her brief had not been filed as required by rule 38.6(a). Tex.R.App.P. 38.6(a). We stated we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. Although have not received a response to our letter, appellant has filed a motion to dismiss appeal.

Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX.R.APP.P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.


Summaries of

Moody v. Monroe

Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth
Nov 20, 2003
No. 02-03-114-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 20, 2003)
Case details for

Moody v. Monroe

Case Details

Full title:JOANNA MOODY, Appellant v. BRUCE MONROE, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth

Date published: Nov 20, 2003

Citations

No. 02-03-114-CV (Tex. App. Nov. 20, 2003)