From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Moody v. Crumbaker

United States District Court, E.D. Texas
Sep 10, 2021
6:20-cv-00243 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 10, 2021)

Opinion

6:20-cv-00243

09-10-2021

Corey Moody, Plaintiff, v. Brent Crumbaker, Defendant.


ORDER

J. CAMPBELL BARKER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Plaintiff Corey Moody, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil-rights lawsuit against defendant Brent Crumbaker, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case was referred to United States Magistrate Judge K. Nicole Mitchell. The magistrate judge issued a report recommending that defendant's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 30) limited to the exhaustion of administrative remedies should be granted and plaintiff's claims against defendant should be dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a). Doc. 31. No objections were filed to the magistrate judge's report.

When there have been no timely objections to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the court reviews it only for clear error. See Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996). Having reviewed the magistrate judge's report, and being satisfied that it contains no clear error, the court accepts its findings and recommendation. Defendant's motion for summary judgment limited to the exhaustion of administrative remedies (Doc. 30) is granted. Plaintiff's civil-rights action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a).

So Ordered.


Summaries of

Moody v. Crumbaker

United States District Court, E.D. Texas
Sep 10, 2021
6:20-cv-00243 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 10, 2021)
Case details for

Moody v. Crumbaker

Case Details

Full title:Corey Moody, Plaintiff, v. Brent Crumbaker, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas

Date published: Sep 10, 2021

Citations

6:20-cv-00243 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 10, 2021)