From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Monzingo v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jun 2, 1937
106 S.W.2d 282 (Tex. Crim. App. 1937)

Opinion

No. 18928.

Delivered June 2, 1937.

Intoxicating Liquor — Information.

An information charging unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor, held insufficient in failing to allege that an election was held in the county and that the result thereof was such as to prohibit the act complained of.

Appeal from the County Court of Hall County. Tried below before the Hon. J. H. Vallance, Judge.

Appeal from conviction for the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor; penalty, fine of $100.

Reversed and prosecution ordered dismissed.

The opinion states the case.

Sam J. Hamilton, of Memphis, and Mahan Broughton, of Childress, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State's Attorney, of Austin, for the State.


The conviction is for the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor; penalty assessed at a fine of $100.00.

The count of the information under which the conviction was obtained is insufficient in failing to allege the steps by which the sale of liquor was prohibited; namely, that an election was held in the county and that the result thereof was such as to prohibit the act complained of. See Whitmire v. State, 94 S.W.2d 742; Kelly v. State, 98 S.W.2d 998; Privitt v. State, 98 S.W.2d 204; Hardin v. State, 101 S.W.2d 264.

For the reason stated, the judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

Reversed and prosecution ordered dismissed.


Summaries of

Monzingo v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jun 2, 1937
106 S.W.2d 282 (Tex. Crim. App. 1937)
Case details for

Monzingo v. State

Case Details

Full title:BILL MONZINGO v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Jun 2, 1937

Citations

106 S.W.2d 282 (Tex. Crim. App. 1937)
132 Tex. Crim. 545

Citing Cases

Frost v. State

State, 131 Tex.Cr.R. 405, 99 S.W.2d 930; McKinney v. State, 131 Tex.Cr.R. 508, 100 S.W.2d 358; Hood v. State,…