From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Montue v. Dept

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 22, 2008
279 F. App'x 506 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 06-15452.

Submitted May 20, 2008.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed May 22, 2008.

John C. Montue, Vacaville, CA, pro se.

Krista L. Pollard, Esq., AGCA — Office of the California Attorney General, Heather M. Heckler, Office of the Attorney General, Sacramento, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Lawrence K. Karlton, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-98-01580-LKK.

Before: PREGERSON, TASHIMA, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


California state prisoner John C. Montue appeals pro se from the district court's order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, in which he challenged the Board of Prison Terms' 1997 decision finding him ineligible for parole. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 2253, and we affirm.

Notwithstanding this court's November 22, 2004, order, we conclude that the district court did not err by refusing to permit Montue to challenge the denial of parole in a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, because such a challenge is only properly brought in a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. See Sass v. Cal. Bd. of Prison Terms, 461 F.3d 1123, 1126 (9th Cir. 2006).

All pending motions are denied as moot.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Montue v. Dept

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 22, 2008
279 F. App'x 506 (9th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Montue v. Dept

Case Details

Full title:John C. MONTUE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: May 22, 2008

Citations

279 F. App'x 506 (9th Cir. 2008)

Citing Cases

Obregon v. Ryan

However, the Report and Recommendation explicitly states that Obregon's petition is properly brought under §…

Bloodsaw v. Ochoa

A state prisoner's challenge to a denial of parole must be brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and not § 2241.…