From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Montoya v. Johnson

Oregon Court of Appeals
May 23, 2001
25 P.3d 415 (Or. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

97-06-28971M; A100422

On remand from the Oregon Supreme Court. Montoya v. Johnson, 330 Or. 360, 6 P.3d 1101 (2000). Submitted on remand July 13, 2000.

Filed: May 23, 2001

Appeal from Circuit Court, Malheur County, J. Burdette Pratt, Judge.

Bob Pangburn for appellant.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General, and Judy C. Lucas, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and EDMONDS and LANDAU, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Affirmed.


Plaintiff appeals from the trial court's dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The crimes for which he is incarcerated took place during the time period during which the administrative rule discussed in Peek v. Thompson , 160 Or. App. 260, 980 P.2d 178, rev dismissed 329 Or. 553 (1999), was in effect. However, plaintiff made no argument in the trial court about the potential applicability of that administrative rule and attempts to raise that issue for the first time in a supplemental memorandum to this court. Because the issue was not preserved in the trial court, we do not consider it in the first instance on appeal. ORAP 5.45(4)(a).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Montoya v. Johnson

Oregon Court of Appeals
May 23, 2001
25 P.3d 415 (Or. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Montoya v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:ROLAND J. MONTOYA, Appellant, v. DAN JOHNSON, Superintendent, Snake River…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: May 23, 2001

Citations

25 P.3d 415 (Or. Ct. App. 2001)
25 P.3d 415

Citing Cases

Petitions for Review

01Anderson v. Swift Transportation (A108095) (S48920) ( 176 Or. App. 361) Astorga, Eliasar Galvez v.…