From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Montoya v. Childers

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 17, 2011
No. CIV S-09-1580 MCE CKD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-1580 MCE CKD P.

October 17, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel (Docket No. 45) is denied.

Dated: October 16, 2011


Summaries of

Montoya v. Childers

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 17, 2011
No. CIV S-09-1580 MCE CKD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2011)
Case details for

Montoya v. Childers

Case Details

Full title:NIKIANO MONTOYA, Plaintiff, v. D. CHILDERS, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 17, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-09-1580 MCE CKD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2011)