From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Montoya v. Childers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 16, 2011
No. CIV S-09-1580 MCE CKD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 16, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-1580 MCE CKD P

10-16-2011

NIKIANO MONTOYA, Plaintiff, v. D. CHILDERS, Defendant.


ORDER

Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for the appointment of counsel (Docket No. 45) is denied.

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Montoya v. Childers

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 16, 2011
No. CIV S-09-1580 MCE CKD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 16, 2011)
Case details for

Montoya v. Childers

Case Details

Full title:NIKIANO MONTOYA, Plaintiff, v. D. CHILDERS, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 16, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-09-1580 MCE CKD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 16, 2011)