From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Montour v. Clements

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Feb 14, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02404-MSK (D. Colo. Feb. 14, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02404-MSK

02-14-2012

EDWARD MONTOUR, Petitioner, v. TOM CLEMENTS, Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections, Respondent.


Honorable Marcia S. Krieger


ORDER

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Petitioner's Ex Parte Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (# 34). Petitioner alleges in the motion that he lacks sufficient funds to pay the filing fee to proceed on appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. The Court notes that the appellate filing fee was paid on January 5, 2012. Therefore, the motion to proceed in forma pauperis will be denied as moot. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that Petitioner's Ex Parte Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (# 34) is DENIED AS MOOT.

BY THE COURT:

____________________________

Marcia S. Krieger

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Montour v. Clements

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Feb 14, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02404-MSK (D. Colo. Feb. 14, 2012)
Case details for

Montour v. Clements

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD MONTOUR, Petitioner, v. TOM CLEMENTS, Executive Director of the…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Feb 14, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02404-MSK (D. Colo. Feb. 14, 2012)