From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Montondo v. Petty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 24, 1964
21 A.D.2d 975 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)

Opinion

September 24, 1964

Appeal from the Erie Special Term.

Present — Williams, P.J., Bastow, Goldman, Noonan and Del Vecchio, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed, without costs of this appeal to any party, and motion denied, without costs, without prejudice to reapply upon appropriate papers. Memorandum: The papers submitted in support of the motion to serve an amended bill of particulars were inadequate in that there was no affidavit by a person with knowledge of the facts. Even though respondent failed to file any affidavits in opposition to the motion, in view of the appearance and oral argument by her counsel in opposition on the return day, the court was required to examine plaintiff's moving papers and, if legally insufficient, to deny the motion.


Summaries of

Montondo v. Petty

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Sep 24, 1964
21 A.D.2d 975 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)
Case details for

Montondo v. Petty

Case Details

Full title:RUTH MONTONDO, Respondent, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BARBARA J. PETTY…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Sep 24, 1964

Citations

21 A.D.2d 975 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964)

Citing Cases

Shea v. Pellicano

( Symphonic Electronic Corp. v. Audio Devices, 24 A.D.2d 746.) Here there was no showing of such unusual and…

Miess v. Walkowiak

Memorandum: There is insufficient support in the record for the order made three years after the accident and…