From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Monticello Lumber Company, Inc. v. Glick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 1, 1932
236 App. Div. 753 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)

Opinion

July, 1932.


Order reversed on the law and facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The defendant's mortgage is not usurious. ( Jenkins v. Moyse, 254 N.Y. 319.) If plaintiff is entitled to any relief it is to be had through an action at law to recover damages for fraud. All concur, except Rhodes, J., who dissents and votes to affirm on the ground that plaintiff is entitled to equitable relief because of the alleged misrepresentations. McNamee, J., not voting.


Summaries of

Monticello Lumber Company, Inc. v. Glick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jul 1, 1932
236 App. Div. 753 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)
Case details for

Monticello Lumber Company, Inc. v. Glick

Case Details

Full title:MONTICELLO LUMBER COMPANY, INC., Respondent, v. ABRAHAM GLICK, Appellant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jul 1, 1932

Citations

236 App. Div. 753 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)