From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Montgomery v. Sullivan

Court of Appeal of California, Third District
Mar 24, 1961
190 Cal.App.2d 874 (Cal. Ct. App. 1961)

Opinion

Docket No. 9984.

March 24, 1961.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sonoma County. Ralph McGee, Judge. Affirmed.

Assigned by Chairman of Judicial Council.

Wallace, Garrison, Norton Ray for Appellant.

Hitchcock Coulter for Respondents.


This case involves the same issues as the case of Puckett v. Sullivan, ante, p. 489 [ 12 Cal.Rptr. 55], 3 Civil Number 10002, in which our opinion was this day filed. Although the two cases were tried separately and decided by different judges, the only factual difference of any significance is that the Montgomery property is farther removed from the area of the cut than the Puckett property. Both appellant and respondents agree that this court's decision in the Puckett case will control the decision in the instant case.

For the reasons set forth in Puckett v. Sullivan, supra, the judgment is affirmed.

Van Dyke, P.J., and Peek, J., concurred.

A petition for a rehearing was denied April 21, 1961, and appellant's petition for a hearing by the Supreme Court was denied May 16, 1961.


Summaries of

Montgomery v. Sullivan

Court of Appeal of California, Third District
Mar 24, 1961
190 Cal.App.2d 874 (Cal. Ct. App. 1961)
Case details for

Montgomery v. Sullivan

Case Details

Full title:GROVER B. MONTGOMERY et al., Respondents, v. CARL SULLIVAN et al.…

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Third District

Date published: Mar 24, 1961

Citations

190 Cal.App.2d 874 (Cal. Ct. App. 1961)
12 Cal. Rptr. 59