From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Montgomery v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Aug 9, 1983
435 So. 2d 968 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

No. 82-929.

August 9, 1983.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Herbert M. Klein, J.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender, and Gelber, Glass, Durant, Canal Darby, Miami, and Joseph Durant, Sp. Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Calianne P. Lantz, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.


The defendant Diamond Derek Montgomery appeals his conviction and sentence entered below for the crime of first degree murder. The sole point on appeal is that the trial court erred "in ruling that the defendant's [oral] confession [to the police] was knowingly and voluntarily made" and in thereafter admitting the said statement in evidence over proper defense objection. We have carefully reviewed the testimony in the record in this case and have concluded that there was sufficient evidence upon which the trial court could have concluded, as it did, that the defendant's statement herein was freely and voluntarily given. See Stone v. State, 378 So.2d 765, 769-70 (Fla. 1979). The judgment of conviction and sentence under review is, accordingly,

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Montgomery v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Aug 9, 1983
435 So. 2d 968 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

Montgomery v. State

Case Details

Full title:DIAMOND DEREK MONTGOMERY, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Aug 9, 1983

Citations

435 So. 2d 968 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1983)

Citing Cases

Snook v. State

There was sufficient, competent evidence in the record — albeit in conflict with other evidence adduced — to…