From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Montgomery v. Nash

United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Northern Division
Dec 3, 2021
3:19-CV-502-CWR-FKB-1 (S.D. Miss. Dec. 3, 2021)

Opinion

3:19-CV-502-CWR-FKB-1

12-03-2021

ROBERT MONTGOMERY PLAINTIFF v. CHERON Y. NASH DEFENDANT


AMENDED ORDER

CARLTON W. REEVES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court is Robert Montgomery's motion requesting permission for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) on appeal to the Fifth Circuit. Docket No. 27.

28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) empowers a United States District Court to authorize commencement of an appeal without paying a filing fee

by a person who submits an affidavit that includes a statement of all assets such prisoner possesses that the person is unable to pay such fees or give security thereof. Such affidavit shall state the nature of the action, defense or appeal and affiant's belief that the person is entitled to redress.
Id.

Mr. Montgomery's motion satisfies these requirements. In it, Mr. Montgomery states that he is appealing the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas corpus petition. Docket No 27 at 1. He also professes his belief that he is entitled to redress due to the Supreme Court's recent ruling in Rehaif v. United States, 139 S.Ct. 2191 (2019). Id.

Mr. Montgomery also sufficiently substantiates his inability to pay the filing fee. In a signed affidavit, he swears that he cannot prepay the docket fees of his appeal or post bond for them. Docket No. 28.

Accordingly, this Court grants Mr. Montgomery's motion to proceed IFP.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Montgomery v. Nash

United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Northern Division
Dec 3, 2021
3:19-CV-502-CWR-FKB-1 (S.D. Miss. Dec. 3, 2021)
Case details for

Montgomery v. Nash

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT MONTGOMERY PLAINTIFF v. CHERON Y. NASH DEFENDANT

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Northern Division

Date published: Dec 3, 2021

Citations

3:19-CV-502-CWR-FKB-1 (S.D. Miss. Dec. 3, 2021)