From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Montgomery v. Hollins

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Feb 24, 2020
No. 3:18-cv-1954-M-BN (N.D. Tex. Feb. 24, 2020)

Opinion

No. 3:18-cv-1954-M-BN

02-24-2020

RODNEY MONTGOMERY, Plaintiff, v. STERLING HOLLINS, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made findings, conclusions, and a recommendation in this case. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

The Court therefore DENIES Defendant Danquell Cameron's motion for summary judgment on his nominally affirmative defense of qualified immunity [Dkt. No. 39].

SO ORDERED this 24th day of February, 2020.

/s/ _________

BARBARA M. G. LYNN

CHIEF JUDGE


Summaries of

Montgomery v. Hollins

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Feb 24, 2020
No. 3:18-cv-1954-M-BN (N.D. Tex. Feb. 24, 2020)
Case details for

Montgomery v. Hollins

Case Details

Full title:RODNEY MONTGOMERY, Plaintiff, v. STERLING HOLLINS, ET AL., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Feb 24, 2020

Citations

No. 3:18-cv-1954-M-BN (N.D. Tex. Feb. 24, 2020)