From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Montgomery v. Folino

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 15, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-2157 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 15, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-2157.

June 15, 2011


ORDER


AND NOW, this ____ day of June, 2011, upon consideration of Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1), Respondents' Response in Opposition thereto (Doc. 10), and after careful review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Lynne Sitarski (Doc. 13), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED and DECREED as follows:

Petitioner did not file objections to the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation.

APPROVED ADOPTED DENIED

1. The Report and Recommendation is and ; 2. Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is ; and 3. There has been no substantial showing of the denial of a Constitutional right requiring the issuance of a certificate of appealability.


Summaries of

Montgomery v. Folino

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jun 15, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-2157 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 15, 2011)
Case details for

Montgomery v. Folino

Case Details

Full title:NILE MONTGOMERY, Petitioner, v. SUPT. LOUIS FOLINO, ET. AL., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jun 15, 2011

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-2157 (E.D. Pa. Jun. 15, 2011)