From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Montgomery v. Burns

U.S.
May 5, 1969
394 U.S. 848 (1969)

Opinion

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.

No. 438.

Decided May 5, 1969.

Affirmed.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and Elizabeth Palmer and Donald B. Day, Deputy Attorneys General, for appellants.


The motion of appellees for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK dissents for the reasons given in the dissenting opinion of THE CHIEF JUSTICE in Shapiro v. Thompson, ante, p. 644.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissents for the reasons given in his dissenting opinion in Shapiro v. Thompson, ante, p. 655.


Summaries of

Montgomery v. Burns

U.S.
May 5, 1969
394 U.S. 848 (1969)
Case details for

Montgomery v. Burns

Case Details

Full title:MONTGOMERY, DIRECTOR, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE, ET AL. v …

Court:U.S.

Date published: May 5, 1969

Citations

394 U.S. 848 (1969)

Citing Cases

Rivera v. Dunn

Only recently the Supreme Court in Graham v. Richardson, 403 U.S. 365, 91 S.Ct. 1848, 29 L.Ed.2d 534 (1971),…

Barnett v. Lindsay

Shapiro expressly invalidated such a residency requirement as a condition to assistance under…