From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Montez v. State

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Sep 27, 2013
NO. 02-13-00069-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 27, 2013)

Opinion

NO. 02-13-00069-CRNO. 02-13-00070-CR

2013-09-27

KENDRAE AMEIN MONTEZ APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE


FROM THE 213TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY


ABATEMENT ORDER

It has come to our attention that appellant's brief has not been filed. Appellant's brief was originally due on July 22, 2013. This court has previously granted one extension of time to file appellant's brief in this case. We have notified the trial court judge and the attorneys of record that appellant's brief has not been filed, as required by rule 38.8(b). See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(b). Because we have not received a satisfactory response to our prior notification and in accordance with rule 38.8(b), we abate the appeal and remand this case to the trial court.

The trial court shall conduct a hearing, with appellant and appointed counsel, Donald S. Gandy, present. At the hearing, the court shall make the following findings on the record:

1. Determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal;
2. Determine why appointed counsel has not filed a brief and whether counsel has abandoned the appeal;
3. If appointed counsel has not abandoned the appeal and appellant desires to continue the appeal, determine the exact date that counsel will file a brief on appellant's behalf in the court of appeals;
4. Determine whether substitute counsel should be appointed to represent appellant and appoint substitute counsel, if necessary;
5. Determine whether appellant desires to proceed pro se. If so, admonish appellant of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation in accordance with Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 835, 95 S. Ct. 2525, 2541 (1975), and Hubbard v. State, 739 S.W.2d 341, 345 (Tex. Crim. App. 1987), and determine whether appellant's decision to proceed pro se is competently and intelligently made;
6. Take any other measures that the trial court deems necessary to insure appellant does not forfeit his right to appeal.

If substitute counsel has been appointed to represent appellant, the supplemental record shall reflect that substitute counsel has been notified of the appointment. If appellant is incarcerated, the trial court shall also retain him in the county for a reasonable period of time to allow substitute counsel an opportunity to confer with appellant.

The trial court shall file a record of the hearing in this court on or before Monday, October 28, 2013. The record shall include a supplemental reporter's record and supplemental clerk's record. Upon our receipt of the supplemental record, the appeal of this cause shall be reinstated automatically without further order.

The clerk of this court shall transmit a copy of this order to the attorneys of record, the trial court judge, the trial court clerk, and the court reporter.

PER CURIAM


Summaries of

Montez v. State

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Sep 27, 2013
NO. 02-13-00069-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 27, 2013)
Case details for

Montez v. State

Case Details

Full title:KENDRAE AMEIN MONTEZ APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

Court:COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Date published: Sep 27, 2013

Citations

NO. 02-13-00069-CR (Tex. App. Sep. 27, 2013)