From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Montez v. Hickenlooper

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jun 4, 2012
Civil Action No. 92-CV-870-JLK (D. Colo. Jun. 4, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 92-CV-870-JLK

06-04-2012

JESSE MONTEZ, et al. Plaintiffs, v. BILL OWENS, et al. Defendants.


Claim Number 03-140

Category III

Claimant: Shawn M. Winkler, #48319

Address of Claimant: SCF, P.O. Box 6000, Sterling, CO 80751

ORDER OF SPECIAL MASTER

THIS MATTER comes before the Special Master on Claimant's Response of Failure to Reply. Doc. #5282. Though Claimant's pleading is disjointed, he appears to be arguing that his previously filed objection should be acted upon and the DOC continues to discriminate against him in violation of the ADA.

Claimant's objection has not been acted upon by Judge Kane. Defendants requested and received additional time in which to respond to the objection, but they did not file any response to the objection. Judge Kane will need to resolve the objection as he deems appropriate.

Judge Kane has ruled that individual pro se motions may not be filed. Claimant may seek the assistance of class counsel or file a new case. Claimant may not pursue any further individual relief through this claim.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the objection of Claimant is referred to Judge Kane for such action as he deems appropriate.

BY THE COURT:

______________________

Richard M. Borchers

Special Master


Summaries of

Montez v. Hickenlooper

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Jun 4, 2012
Civil Action No. 92-CV-870-JLK (D. Colo. Jun. 4, 2012)
Case details for

Montez v. Hickenlooper

Case Details

Full title:JESSE MONTEZ, et al. Plaintiffs, v. JOHN HICKENLOOPER, et al. Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Jun 4, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 92-CV-870-JLK (D. Colo. Jun. 4, 2012)