From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Montez v. Jones

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 3, 2021
2:20-cv-1681 JAM JDP P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 3, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cv-1681 JAM JDP P

09-03-2021

RONALD T. MONTEZ, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT R. JONES, et al., Defendant.


ORDER

THE HONORABLE JOHN A. MENDEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On March 30, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. /////

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 30, 2021, are adopted in full;

2. Plaintiff's amended complaint, ECF No. 15, is dismissed with prejudice and without leave to amend for failure to state a claim.


Summaries of

Montez v. Jones

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 3, 2021
2:20-cv-1681 JAM JDP P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 3, 2021)
Case details for

Montez v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:RONALD T. MONTEZ, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT R. JONES, et al., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 3, 2021

Citations

2:20-cv-1681 JAM JDP P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 3, 2021)