From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Montez v. Hickenlooper

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 22, 2012
Civil Action No. 92-cv-870-JLK (D. Colo. Oct. 22, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 92-cv-870-JLK

10-22-2012

JESSE MONTEZ, et al. Plaintiffs, v. JOHN HICKENLOOPER, et al. Defendants.


Claim Number 03-457
Category III
Claimant: Rodney Zimmerman, #135354
Address of Claimant: CSP, P.O. Box 777, Canon City, CO 81210-0777

ORDER OF SPECIAL MASTER

THIS MATTER comes before the Special Master on Claimant's letter of October 11, 2012. In that letter, Claimant requests assistance in obtaining accommodations and retaining his wheelchair.

Claimant filed a claim pursuant to Article XXXII of the Remedial Plan. The claim was denied because Claimant had come into DOC custody after August 27, 2003.

Judge Kane has ruled that no additional claims or pro se motions may be filed in this case. There is no jurisdiction over this motion. Claimant's remedy is to file his own lawsuit concerning his present treatment.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the letter of Claimant, being treated as a motion, is denied for lack of jurisdiction; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this letter will be forwarded to class counsel for such action as may be deemed appropriate.

BY THE COURT:

_________________

Richard M. Borchers

Special Master


Summaries of

Montez v. Hickenlooper

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 22, 2012
Civil Action No. 92-cv-870-JLK (D. Colo. Oct. 22, 2012)
Case details for

Montez v. Hickenlooper

Case Details

Full title:JESSE MONTEZ, et al. Plaintiffs, v. JOHN HICKENLOOPER, et al. Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Oct 22, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 92-cv-870-JLK (D. Colo. Oct. 22, 2012)