From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Montez v. Hickenlooper

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Feb 7, 2012
Civil Action No. 92-CV-870-JLK (D. Colo. Feb. 7, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 92-CV-870-JLK

02-07-2012

JESSE MONTEZ, et al. Plaintiffs, v. JOHN HICKENLOOPER, et al. Defendants.


Claim Number 01-103

Category: I

Claimant: Robert Griego, #117534

Address of Claimant: SCF, P.O. Box 6000, Sterling, CO 80751

ORDER OF SPECIAL MASTER

THIS MATTER comes before the Special Master on a copy of Claimant's letter to Ms. Cathie Holst at Correctional Legal Services. Claimant is advised that Ms. Holst has retired.

Claimant has expressed concerns about the medical care has received at SCF. In particular, he has raised a concern about his CPAP machine. The Special Master would note that Claimant did file a claim pursuant to Article XXXII of the Remedial Plan. That claim was denied on November 26, 2007. The Special Master lost further jurisdiction on dismissal of the claim. The Special Master has no power to help Claimant in any way due to lack of jurisdiction.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that no further action can be taken by the Special Master on Claimant's letter.

BY THE COURT:

_________________

Richard M. Borchers

Special Master


Summaries of

Montez v. Hickenlooper

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Feb 7, 2012
Civil Action No. 92-CV-870-JLK (D. Colo. Feb. 7, 2012)
Case details for

Montez v. Hickenlooper

Case Details

Full title:JESSE MONTEZ, et al. Plaintiffs, v. JOHN HICKENLOOPER, et al. Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Feb 7, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 92-CV-870-JLK (D. Colo. Feb. 7, 2012)