From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Montez v. Hickenlooper

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 23, 2012
Civil Action No. 92-CV-870-JLK (D. Colo. Apr. 23, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 92-CV-870-JLK

04-23-2012

JESSE MONTEZ, et al. Plaintiffs, v. JOHN HICKENLOOPER, et al. Defendants.


Claim Number X-326

Category: Untimely Filed Claim

Claimant: John Garcia, #134454

Address of Claimant: CTCF, P.O. Box 1010, Canon City, CO 81215-1010

ORDER OF SPECIAL MASTER

THIS MATTER comes before the Special Master on the letter filed by Claimant. In that letter, Claimant relates that his vibrating watch was stolen through no fault of his own and a new watch has not been provided to him by DOC.

Claimant previously filed a letter with the Special Master in early 2010 that was treated as a claim under Article XXXII of the Remedial Plan. Claimant did not come into DOC custody until December, 2006. His claim was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Nothing has changed since Claimant's claim was dismissed on May 28, 2010.

Judge Kane has ruled that pro se motions may not be filed as this stage of the proceedings. The Special Master and Judge have no jurisdiction over the motion of Claimant.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the letter of John Garcia, being treated as new claim or pro se motion, is dismissed, as the Claimant came into DOC custody after August 27,2003; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of Claimant's letter will be provided to class counsel for such action as may be deemed appropriate; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Claimant, Defendants and class counsel are advised that they may file an objection to this Order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 53(g)(2), but said objection must be filed with the Clerk of the United States District Court, 901 19th Street, Denver, CO 80294 on or before June 11, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

____________

Richard M. Borchers

Special Master


Summaries of

Montez v. Hickenlooper

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 23, 2012
Civil Action No. 92-CV-870-JLK (D. Colo. Apr. 23, 2012)
Case details for

Montez v. Hickenlooper

Case Details

Full title:JESSE MONTEZ, et al. Plaintiffs, v. JOHN HICKENLOOPER, et al. Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Apr 23, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 92-CV-870-JLK (D. Colo. Apr. 23, 2012)