From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Montez v. Hickenlooper

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 29, 2012
Civil Action No. 92-CV-870-JLK (D. Colo. Aug. 29, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 92-CV-870-JLK

08-29-2012

JESSE MONTEZ, et al. Plaintiffs, v. JOHN HICKENLOOPER, et al. Defendants.


Claim Number 01-076
Category: I
Claimant: Lawrence Fitzgerald, #66345
Address of Claimant: SCF, P.O. Box 6000, Sterling, CO 80751

ORDER OF SPECIAL MASTER

THIS MATTER comes before the Special Master on the Claimant's letter which is dated August 23, 2012. Claimant has alleged that he is disabled and needs help.

The Montez case is drawing to a close. Judge Kane has under advisement the compliance issues which affect all DOC inmates. Judge Kane has ruled that the time for filing individual motions is at an end. Claimant has been so advised. His remedy is to file a new lawsuit. Claimant will be granted additional time to file an objection to the March 5, 2012 order. Beyond that, there is no jurisdiction to do anything else.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Claimant is granted up to and including September 10, 2012 in which to file an objection to the order of March 5, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

____________

Richard M. Borchers

Special Master


Summaries of

Montez v. Hickenlooper

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 29, 2012
Civil Action No. 92-CV-870-JLK (D. Colo. Aug. 29, 2012)
Case details for

Montez v. Hickenlooper

Case Details

Full title:JESSE MONTEZ, et al. Plaintiffs, v. JOHN HICKENLOOPER, et al. Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Aug 29, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 92-CV-870-JLK (D. Colo. Aug. 29, 2012)