From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Montez v. Hickenlooper

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 9, 2012
Civil Action No. 92-CV-870-JLK (D. Colo. Apr. 9, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 92-CV-870-JLK

04-09-2012

JESSE MONTEZ, et al. Plaintiffs, v. JOHN HICKENLOOPER, et al. Defendants.


Claim Number 01-092

Category: I

Claimant: James Rudnick, #68432

Address of Claimant: SCF, P.O. Box 6000, Sterling, CO 80751

ORDER OF SPECIAL MASTER

THIS MATTER comes before the Special Master on Claimant's motion for enlargement of time and Claimant's request for hearing transcripts. Claimant and Defendants will be granted up to and including May 29, 2012 in which to respond to the Report and Recommendation of the Special Master, dated February 6, 2012.

Claimant has requested a loan of the audio compact disks made during the hearing of February 6, 2012. The Special Master has been advised over the years by DOC staff that compact disks are not allowed in the possession of inmates. Claimant will need to check with staff at SCF to determine if a copy of each disk can be part of Claimant's property. Claimant may want to check with his case manager to see if that person would maintain the disks and allow Claimant to listen to them.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Claimant and Defendants are granted up to and including May 29, 2012 in which to file objections to the Report and Recommendation of the Special Master, dated February 6, 2012; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Claimant's request for hearing transcripts will be held in abeyance.

BY THE COURT:

_______________

Richard M. Borchers

Special Master


Summaries of

Montez v. Hickenlooper

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 9, 2012
Civil Action No. 92-CV-870-JLK (D. Colo. Apr. 9, 2012)
Case details for

Montez v. Hickenlooper

Case Details

Full title:JESSE MONTEZ, et al. Plaintiffs, v. JOHN HICKENLOOPER, et al. Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Apr 9, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 92-CV-870-JLK (D. Colo. Apr. 9, 2012)