From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Montenegro v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 2, 2000
270 A.D.2d 19 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

March 2, 2000

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Braun, J.), entered December 16, 1998, which, insofar as appealed from, denied defendant-appellant's motion for summary judgment as untimely, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Melisande Hill, for Plaintiff-Respondent.

Michael E. Pressman, for Defendant-Appellant.

NARDELLI, J.P., TOM, LERNER, RUBIN, FRIEDMAN, JJ.


The motion was untimely even if the 120-day limit in CPLR 3212(a) were to be measured from the return of the last deposition transcript rather than the filing of the note of issue(see, Kearns v. City of New York, 263 A.D.2d 412, 694 N.Y.S.2d 359).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Montenegro v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 2, 2000
270 A.D.2d 19 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Montenegro v. City of New York

Case Details

Full title:ELBA MONTENEGRO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 2, 2000

Citations

270 A.D.2d 19 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
703 N.Y.S.2d 723