From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Montemarano v. Montemarano

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 24, 2001
792 So. 2d 573 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

Case No. 4D01-2807

Opinion filed July 24, 2001

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Dorian Damoorgian, Judge; L.T. Case No. FMCE 01-13192.

Ben I. Farbstein of Law Offices of Ben I. Farbstein, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

C. Annelies Mouring, Greenacres, and Richard J. Burton of Richard J. Burton Associates, P.A., Aventura, for appellee.


We treat Appellant's petition as a request for appellate review of a final judgment of injunction for protection against domestic violence and reverse the portion of the order requiring Appellant to vacate the premises. Due process requires that a party receive notice and an opportunity to be heard prior to entry of an order that affects her interests. Cortina v. Cortina, 98 So.2d 334 (Fla. 1957); Szymanski v. Szymanski, 603 So.2d 73, 74 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). Appellee did not seek exclusive use and possession of the residence.

That portion of the trial court is quashed and this case is remanded for further proceedings.

POLEN, C.J., STONE and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Montemarano v. Montemarano

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 24, 2001
792 So. 2d 573 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Montemarano v. Montemarano

Case Details

Full title:HELENA MONTEMARANO, Appellant, v. ROBERT MONTEMARANO, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jul 24, 2001

Citations

792 So. 2d 573 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Citing Cases

Cervieri v. Cervieri

These procedural requirements are essential in hearings where a trial court changes the custody of minor…