Opinion
2022-61182 Motion 2021-03245
02-02-2022
Montefiore Nyack Hospital, et al., appellants, v. Michael E. Rader, respondent. Index No. 34656/2019
Unpublished Opinion
MOTION DECISION
M281307 MB/
BETSY BARROS, J.P. REINALDO E. RIVERA PAUL WOOTEN WILLIAM G. FORD, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated April 29, 2021. Motion by the appellants, inter alia, to extend the time to perfect the appeal until 30 days after a determination by the Court of Appeals in actions entitled Schoch v Lake Champlain OB-GYN, P.C., Case No. APL-2020-00169, Columbia Memorial Hospital v Hinds, Case No. APL-2021-00001, Maple Medical, LLP v Scott, Case No. APL 2021-00045, Maple Medical, LLP v Goldenberg, Case No. APL-2021-00046, Maple Medical, LLP v Arevalo, Case No. APL-2021-00047, Maple Medical, LLP v Sundaram, Case No. APL-2021-00048, Maple Medical, LLP v Mutic, Case No. APL-2021-00049, and Maple Medical, LLP v Youkeles, Case No. APL-2021-00050.
Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and no papers having been filed in opposition or in relation thereto, it is
ORDERED that the motion is granted to the extent that within 30 days after a determination by the Court of Appeals in actions entitled Schoch v Lake Champlain OB-GYN, P.C., Case No. APL-2020-00169, Columbia Memorial Hospital v Hinds, Case No. APL-2021-00001, Maple Medical, LLP v Scott, Case No. APL 2021-00045, Maple Medical, LLP v Goldenberg, Case No. APL-2021-00046, Maple Medical, LLP v Arevalo, Case No. APL-2021-00047, Maple Medical, LLP v Sundaram, Case No. APL-2021-00048, Maple Medical, LLP v Mutic, Case No. APL-2021-00049, and Maple Medical, LLP v Youkeles, Case No. APL-2021-00050, the appellants shall perfect the appeal or advise the Court that they are withdrawing the appeal, and the motion is otherwise denied.
The parties shall advise this Court expeditiously when the Court of Appeals decides Schoch v Lake Champlain OB-GYN, P.C., Case No. APL-2020-00169, Columbia Memorial Hospital v Hinds, Case No. APL-2021-00001, Maple Medical, LLP v Scott, Case No. APL 2021-00045, Maple Medical, LLP v Goldenberg, Case No. APL-2021-00046, Maple Medical, LLP v Arevalo, Case No. APL-2021-00047, Maple Medical, LLP v Sundaram, Case No. APL-2021-00048, Maple Medical, LLP v Mutic, Case No. APL-2021-00049, and Maple Medical, LLP v Youkeles, Case No. APL-2021-00050.
BARROS, J.P., RIVERA, WOOTEN and FORD, JJ., concur.