From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Monte v. Mingo

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jun 28, 2016
140 A.D.3d 617 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

06-28-2016

In re Frank MONTE, Petitioner, v. Warden Maxsolaine MINGO, N.Y.C. Dept. Of Corrections, etc., et al., Respondents.

Frank Monte, petitioner pro se. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Grace Vee of counsel), for respondents.


Frank Monte, petitioner pro se.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Grace Vee of counsel), for respondents.

Opinion

The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules, and for related relief,

Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is unanimously ordered that the application and request for related relief be and the same hereby are denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

MAZZARELLI, J.P., ANDRIAS, SAXE, GISCHE, KAHN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Monte v. Mingo

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jun 28, 2016
140 A.D.3d 617 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

Monte v. Mingo

Case Details

Full title:In re Frank MONTE, Petitioner, v. Warden Maxsolaine MINGO, N.Y.C. Dept. Of…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 28, 2016

Citations

140 A.D.3d 617 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 5070
33 N.Y.S.3d 709