From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Monte v. Anderson

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
Sep 23, 2020
310 So. 3d 121 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Opinion

Case No. 2D20-1488

09-23-2020

Frank MONTE, Petitioner, v. Kimberly S. ANDERSON and Robert Anderson, Respondents.

Charles D. Radeline of Radeline Law Firm, PLC, Palm Harbor, for Petitioner. Michael A. Giasi of Giasi Law, P.A., Tampa, for Respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Charles D. Radeline of Radeline Law Firm, PLC, Palm Harbor, for Petitioner.

Michael A. Giasi of Giasi Law, P.A., Tampa, for Respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed as moot.

VILLANTI, LaROSE, and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.

Summaries of

Monte v. Anderson

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
Sep 23, 2020
310 So. 3d 121 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

Monte v. Anderson

Case Details

Full title:FRANK MONTE, Petitioner, v. KIMBERLY S. ANDERSON and ROBERT ANDERSON…

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

Date published: Sep 23, 2020

Citations

310 So. 3d 121 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2020)