From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Montano v. Reyes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 27, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-1798-GEB-KJN-P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 27, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-1798-GEB-KJN-P

07-27-2012

RAUL MONTANO, Plaintiff, v. D. REYES, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On May 30, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 30, 2012, are adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiff's claims against defendants Podolsky, Clark, Hammond and Foston are dismissed.

______________________________

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Montano v. Reyes

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 27, 2012
No. 2:11-cv-1798-GEB-KJN-P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Montano v. Reyes

Case Details

Full title:RAUL MONTANO, Plaintiff, v. D. REYES, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 27, 2012

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-1798-GEB-KJN-P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 27, 2012)