From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Montag v. Sutherland

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Feb 20, 1998
498 S.E.2d 86 (Ga. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

A97A2188.

DECIDED FEBRUARY 20, 1998.

Attorney fees. Fulton State Court. Before Judge Thompson.

Ralph J. Villani, for appellant.

Hawkins Parnell, Howell Hollis III, for appellees.


Jeffrey B. Montag sued attorneys Marsha Sutherland, Darryl Cohen, the law firm where Sutherland and Cohen worked, Katz, Smith Cohen, and other named partners in the firm (collectively "the defendants") for legal malpractice arising from Cohen's and Sutherland's representation of Montag in defense of a DUI charge in Gwinnett County. Montag subsequently dismissed the suit without prejudice, and the defendants moved for an award of attorney's fees pursuant to OCGA § 9-15-14. Montag in turn filed his own motion for attorney's fees under OCGA § 9-15-14. Without holding a hearing and making findings of fact, the trial court denied Montag's motion for attorney's fees and granted the defendants' motion, awarding them $1,208 in fees. We reverse.

Montag enumerates as error the trial court's failure to hold a hearing prior to awarding the defendants attorney's fees and in failing to include findings of conduct that supported the award. The defendants do not contest Montag's argument, stating that they "agree that the trial court should have conducted a hearing and should have entered findings of fact and conclusions of law on said motion." We agree with both parties, as it is clear that "since the trial court's order does not include findings of conduct which would authorize an award of attorney fees under OCGA § 9-15-14, the trial judge's order must be vacated. [Cits.]" Hardwick-Morrison Co. v. Mayland, 206 Ga. App. 426, 427 ( 425 S.E.2d 416) (1992). See also Porter v. Felker, 261 Ga. 421, 422 (3) ( 405 S.E.2d 31) (1991).

Accordingly, we reverse and remand the case "with direction that the trial judge vacate the order, prepare appropriate findings of fact and enter a new judgment thereon, after which the losing party may appeal." Mayland, supra.

Judgment reversed and remanded with direction. Birdsong, P. J., and Eldridge, J., concur.


DECIDED FEBRUARY 20, 1998.


Summaries of

Montag v. Sutherland

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Feb 20, 1998
498 S.E.2d 86 (Ga. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Montag v. Sutherland

Case Details

Full title:MONTAG v. SUTHERLAND et al

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Feb 20, 1998

Citations

498 S.E.2d 86 (Ga. Ct. App. 1998)
498 S.E.2d 86

Citing Cases

Waters v. Waters

Accordingly, at a bare minimum, we would reverse and remand the case for appropriate findings of fact and a…

Parland v. Millennium Construction Services

See Premier/Ga. Mgmt. Co. v. Realty Mgmt. Corp., 272 Ga. App. 780 (1), n. 2 ( 613 SE2d 112) (2005). See id.;…