From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Monster Energy Co. v. Beastup LLC

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 2, 2021
2:17-cv-01605-KJM-JDP (E.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2021)

Opinion

2:17-cv-01605-KJM-JDP

12-02-2021

Monster Energy Company, Plaintiff, v. Beastup LLC, Defendant.


ORDER

Plaintiff Monster Energy Company moves in limine for an order prohibiting defendant Beastup LLC from offering at trial any evidence or argument that Monster is a “trademark bully” and from using other similar disparaging labels. See generally Mot., ECF No. 70; Mem., ECF No. 71. The matter is fully briefed. See generally Opp'n, ECF No. 74; Reply, ECF No. 76. As discussed at the status conference on December 2, 2021, the motion is granted without prejudice to the use of such evidence or arguments in a post-trial motion for attorneys' fees. See, e.g., 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a); Lahoti v. Vericheck, Inc., 708 F.Supp.2d 1150, 1171 (W.D. Wash. 2010) (awarding fees in response to motion raising similar arguments), affd, 636 F.3d 501, 510-11 (9th Cir. 2011). This order resolves ECF No. 70.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Monster Energy Co. v. Beastup LLC

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 2, 2021
2:17-cv-01605-KJM-JDP (E.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2021)
Case details for

Monster Energy Co. v. Beastup LLC

Case Details

Full title:Monster Energy Company, Plaintiff, v. Beastup LLC, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 2, 2021

Citations

2:17-cv-01605-KJM-JDP (E.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2021)