From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Monschke v. Cross

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
May 23, 2011
NO. C11-5276/KLS (W.D. Wash. May. 23, 2011)

Opinion

NO. C11-5276/KLS.

May 23, 2011


ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S MOTION TO STAY


Before the court is Petitioner's motion to stay his federal habeas proceedings pending conclusion of the pending state court proceedings. ECF No. 4. Respondents do not object to Petitioner's motion. ECF No. 15. Having reviewed the motion, response, and balance of the record, the undersigned finds that it is proper to stay these proceedings until Mr. Monschke's state court proceedings have been completely adjudicated.

BACKGROUND

Mr. Monschke filed a habeas corpus petition in this Court on April 12, 2011, in which he challenges his state court convictions. ECF No. 1. On the same day, Mr. Monschke filed a motion to stay and abey his habeas proceedings. ECF No. 4. Mr. Monschke seeks a stay until his state court proceedings are concluded. On April 16, 2011, his counsel filed a motion for discretionary review in the Washington Supreme Court in Case No. 85829-2. That motion is still pending.

DISCUSSION

The court may stay a petition where the stay would be a proper exercise of discretion. Rhines v. Weber, 125 S. Ct. 1528, 1534 (2005); see also Fetterly v. Paskett, 997 F.2d 1295 (9th Cir. 1993); Calderon v. United States Dist. Court (Thomas). 144 F.3d 618, 620 (9th Cir. 1998); Anthony v. Cambra, 236 F.3d 568 (9th Cir. 2000).

The court agrees that a stay of this federal habeas proceeding is the appropriate course of action and that neither party shall be prejudiced by such a stay. The stay shall remain in place until such time as Mr. Monschke notifies this court and the Respondent in writing that the pending state court proceedings are completed. Once the pending state court proceedings are completed, Respondent shall have 45 days to file his answer to Mr. Monschke's habeas petition from the date of the court's Order dissolving the stay.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

(1) Petitioner's motion for a stay (ECF No. 4) is GRANTED and this matter is STAYED pending resolution of the state court proceedings.

(2) Petitioner shall advise the Court within thirty (30) days of receiving a final State court ruling.


Summaries of

Monschke v. Cross

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma
May 23, 2011
NO. C11-5276/KLS (W.D. Wash. May. 23, 2011)
Case details for

Monschke v. Cross

Case Details

Full title:KURTIS MONSCHKE, Petitioner, v. JAMES N. CROSS and ELDON VAIL, Respondents

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington, at Tacoma

Date published: May 23, 2011

Citations

NO. C11-5276/KLS (W.D. Wash. May. 23, 2011)