From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Monroe v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Mar 6, 2018
541 S.W.3d 53 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

WD 80128

03-06-2018

Daleron M. MONROE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Casey A. Taylor, for Appellant. Karen L. Kramer, Jefferson City, for Respondent.


Casey A. Taylor, for Appellant.

Karen L. Kramer, Jefferson City, for Respondent.

Before Division One: Thomas H. Newton, Presiding Judge, Victor C. Howard, Judge and Karen King Mitchell, Judge

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Daleron Monroe appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief after a hearing. He presents two points on appeal. First, he claims a reasonably competent attorney would have requested disqualification of the Cole County Prosecutor's Office or of a particular prosecutor. Second, he claims the trial court erred in finding that a particular prosecutor did not represent the State of Missouri at the guilty plea hearing. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Monroe v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Mar 6, 2018
541 S.W.3d 53 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Monroe v. State

Case Details

Full title:Daleron M. MONROE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Mar 6, 2018

Citations

541 S.W.3d 53 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018)