From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Monroe v. Krippel

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 26, 2010
399 F. App'x 799 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 10-2012.

Submitted: October 19, 2010.

Decided: October 26, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (5:10-cv-00065-sgw).

Brother Yhwh H. Monroe, Appellant Pro Se. Robert A. Dybing, Neil S. Talegaonkar, Thompson McMullan, PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Brother Yhwh H. Monroe appeals the district court's order dismissing his complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Monroe v. Krippel, No. 5:10-cv-00065-sgw, 2010 WL 3200091 (W.D.Va. Aug. 11, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Monroe v. Krippel

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 26, 2010
399 F. App'x 799 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Monroe v. Krippel

Case Details

Full title:Brother Yhwh H. MONROE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ms. Nancy KRIPPEL, Mary…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Oct 26, 2010

Citations

399 F. App'x 799 (4th Cir. 2010)