From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Monroe v. Heinlen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
May 16, 2016
No. CV 14-03202-SJO (DFM) (C.D. Cal. May. 16, 2016)

Opinion

No. CV 14-03202-SJO (DFM)

05-16-2016

JAMES MONROE, JR., Plaintiff, v. J. HEINLEN, Defendants.


Order Accepting Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the Court has reviewed the Second Amended Complaint, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the assigned United States Magistrate Judge. Neither party has filed any written objections to the Report.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted.

2. Defendant's motion to dismiss is denied. / / / / / / / / /

3. Defendant is ordered to file an Answer within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. Dated: May 16, 2016

/s/_________

S. JAMES OTERO

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Monroe v. Heinlen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
May 16, 2016
No. CV 14-03202-SJO (DFM) (C.D. Cal. May. 16, 2016)
Case details for

Monroe v. Heinlen

Case Details

Full title:JAMES MONROE, JR., Plaintiff, v. J. HEINLEN, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: May 16, 2016

Citations

No. CV 14-03202-SJO (DFM) (C.D. Cal. May. 16, 2016)