Opinion
No. 81048
05-07-2020
Daimon MONROE, Petitioner, v. The EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT of the State of Nevada, IN AND FOR the COUNTY OF CLARK; and the Honorable Eric Johnson, District Judge, Respondents, and The State of Nevada, Real Party in Interest.
Daimon Monroe Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney
Daimon Monroe
Attorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION
This original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition appears to allege that the State failed to produce material evidence—specifically, two search warrants.
Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with all of the exhibits or documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition"). Therefore, without deciding the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter. See NRAP 21(b).
We reiterate that "[p]etitioner[ ] carr[ies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted." Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court , 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004).
Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.