From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Monroe v. Albert Antor and Son Jewelers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 10, 1986
117 A.D.2d 657 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

February 10, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Levitt, J.).


Order reversed, insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, motion granted, and complaint dismissed as against defendant Brinn and Sicker.

The plaintiff did not properly serve process on the appellant, a partnership, as required by CPLR 310. Even if the plaintiff's subsequent service of process were to be considered, reversal would still be required since the plaintiff has not established that the appellant, which has its place of business in New York County, was properly subject to the jurisdiction of the District Court (see, UDCA 404 [a] [1]). Mollen, P.J., Gibbons, Brown, Niehoff and Eiber, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Monroe v. Albert Antor and Son Jewelers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 10, 1986
117 A.D.2d 657 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Monroe v. Albert Antor and Son Jewelers

Case Details

Full title:BARBARA MONROE, Respondent, v. ALBERT ANTOR AND SON JEWELERS et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 10, 1986

Citations

117 A.D.2d 657 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)