Monger v. Pfizer Inc. (In re Bkxtra & Celebrex Mktg. Sales Practices & Prod. Liab. Litig.)

Full title: In re: BEXTRA AND CELEBREX MARKETING SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCT LIABILITY…

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Oct 5, 2011

Case No.: 08-4187 CRB (N.D. Cal. Oct. 5, 2011)

Opinion

Case No.: 08-4187 CRB MDL NO. 1699

10-05-2011

In re: BEXTRA AND CELEBREX MARKETING SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCT LIABILITY LITIGATION Rhonda Monger, Plaintiff, v. Pfizer Inc, ct al., Defendants.

WIGGINS CHILDS QUINN & PANTAZIS, LLC Attorneys for Plaintiff DLA PIPER LLP (US) Defendants' Liaison Counsel

Charles R. Breyer

Samuel Fisher

Wiggins Childs Quinn & Pantazis, LLC

Attorneys for Plaintiff

District Judge: Charles R. Breyer

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Come now the Plaintiff and Defendants in the above-entitled action, by and through the undersigned attorneys, pursuant to Federal Rule ofCivil Procedure, Rule 41(a), and hereby stipulate to the dismissal of this action with prejudice with each side bearing its own attorneys' fees and costs.

By: WIGGINS CHILDS QUINN & PANTAZIS,

LLC

Attorneys for Plaintiff

By: DLA PIPER LLP (US)

Defendants' Liaison Counsel

PURSUANT TO THE TERMS SET FORTH IN THE PARTIES' STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Hon. Charles R. Breyer

United States District Court